Visual Specialization and Brain Evolution in Primates [RSPB]RA Barton 1998

Abstract: Several theories have been proposed to explain the evolution of species differences in brain size, but no concensus has emerged. One unresolved question is whether brain size differences are a result of neural specializations or of biological constraints affecting the whole brain. Here I show that, among primates, brain size variation is associated with visual specialization. Primates with large brains for their body size have relatively expanded visual brain areas, including the primary visual cortex and lateral geniculate nucleus. Within the visual system, it is, in particular, one functionally specialized pathway upon which selection has acted: evolutionary changes in the number of neurons in parvocellular, but not magno- cellular, layers of the lateral geniculate nucleus are correlated with changes in both brain size and ecological variables (diet and social group size). Given the known functions of the parvocellular pathway, these results suggest that the relatively large brains of frugivorous species are products of selection on the ability to perceive and select fruits using specifc visual cues such as colour. The separate correlation between group size and visual brain evolution, on the other hand, may indicate the visual basis of social information processing in the primate brain.

This article is required reading if you want to read his 2004 PNAS article since the PNAS article uses his previous findings to make speculative and receive counterintuitive results on the role of the parvocellular layers and magnocellular layers on binocularity. Both articles provide highly speculative hypotheses that can provide a long critique/thought/thinktank sessions. Nevertheless, these articles both provide information on the role of binocularity and speculates on whether the brain evolved due to more internal or external forces. 

Visual Specialization and Brain Evolution in Primates [RSPB]
RA Barton 1998

Abstract: Several theories have been proposed to explain the evolution of species differences in brain size, but no concensus has emerged. One unresolved question is whether brain size differences are a result of neural specializations or of biological constraints affecting the whole brain. Here I show that, among primates, brain size variation is associated with visual specialization. Primates with large brains for their body size have relatively expanded visual brain areas, including the primary visual cortex and lateral geniculate nucleus. Within the visual system, it is, in particular, one functionally specialized pathway upon which selection has acted: evolutionary changes in the number of neurons in parvocellular, but not magno- cellular, layers of the lateral geniculate nucleus are correlated with changes in both brain size and ecological variables (diet and social group size). Given the known functions of the parvocellular pathway, these results suggest that the relatively large brains of frugivorous species are products of selection on the ability to perceive and select fruits using specifc visual cues such as colour. The separate correlation between group size and visual brain evolution, on the other hand, may indicate the visual basis of social information processing in the primate brain.

This article is required reading if you want to read his 2004 PNAS article since the PNAS article uses his previous findings to make speculative and receive counterintuitive results on the role of the parvocellular layers and magnocellular layers on binocularity. Both articles provide highly speculative hypotheses that can provide a long critique/thought/thinktank sessions. Nevertheless, these articles both provide information on the role of binocularity and speculates on whether the brain evolved due to more internal or external forces. 

shared 1 year ago, with 565 notes


  1. ilovekarintay reblogged this from anthrocentric
  2. coltonburpodeathcult reblogged this from lolcthulhu
  3. lolcthulhu reblogged this from magusworkshop
  4. magusworkshop reblogged this from theoriginofthespecies
  5. forever-forgetting reblogged this from theoriginofthespecies
  6. iaccidentallyallthephysics reblogged this from theoriginofthespecies
  7. robintheghost reblogged this from theoriginofthespecies
  8. preppybiologist reblogged this from theoriginofthespecies
  9. my-place12 reblogged this from theoriginofthespecies
  10. scientifically-made reblogged this from theoriginofthespecies
  11. theoriginofthespecies reblogged this from great-ape-see
  12. ozilot reblogged this from great-ape-see
  13. great-ape-see reblogged this from anthrocentric
  14. judehd reblogged this from anthrocentric
  15. shirtless-science reblogged this from mo-mtn-girl
  16. mo-mtn-girl reblogged this from theoriginofthespecies
  17. facialteeth reblogged this from thunderkit
  18. thunderkit reblogged this from theoriginofthespecies
  19. ghostly2lighten reblogged this from theoriginofthespecies
  20. yeahshitnesshappens reblogged this from theoriginofthespecies
  21. 1998bl11 reblogged this from theoriginofthespecies
  22. x-pearlyscreamer-x reblogged this from anthrocentric
  23. the-electric-boogaloo reblogged this from laurelpo
  24. laurelpo reblogged this from anthrocentric
  25. andy637 reblogged this from anthrocentric
  26. magikaroline reblogged this from anthrocentric
  27. blind-eleutheromania reblogged this from anthrocentric